The Anthroblogogist 

Yes, sure this title is a tad bit insulting. I did ponder changing it but the reason I am making this list is because of the overwhelming amount of people out there who still don't know what they are talking about. One parent on a article about Amanda Peet dissing parents who choose not to vaccinate said "What if you don't have a choice. If I decided not to let my kids get vaccinated, I would have to home school them...." I wonder if this parent ever thought about googling words like "vaccines" with other words like "exemption,  opt-out, options, choices". I wonder what this statement would look like if we took it out of the context of today and vaccines and considered say microchipping, the grandchild of vaccination; We might have something like "If I decide not to let my kids get chipped I would have to home school them...". This page is simply for the parents who find it difficult for what ever reason to search the web and evaluate information. 

* Most vaccines contain toxic ingredients that the manufactures refer to as "purifiers" because when your read the word purified you will most likely think..."hmm pure--thats good huh?". These purifiers are bio killers like thimerosal (mercury) and/or the newer replacement formaldehyde to which there are NO safe dosages for the human body, let alone our newborns, infants and toddlers. They are used to kill or weaken the viral/bacterial concoction and or used as a preservative.

Let's Think: If mercury and formaldehyde are poisons, scientifically linked with serious, irreversible illnesses and even death; Is it a logical risk to take in hopes that subjecting ourselves and children to this will prevent disease that they may never catch, and are highly preventable via simple things like hand washing, and healthy care of one's own immune system? Its russian roulette really, we are gambling on whether the child will be poisoned or not when we inject them with these ingredients. Medical pamphlets supplied by drug companies that make the vaccines can be quoted saying things like  "There is no convincing evidence of harm caused by the small amounts of thimerosal in vaccines, except for minor effects like swelling and redness at the injection site due to sensitivity to thimerosal." Convincing is in the eye of the beholder and the researcher or lack there of. Many of these vaccine companies aren't doing the proper tests or are altering the test via unethical measures. Common sense should tell you that no amount of these toxins are safe for humans. From another article proclaiming the safety of thimerosal "A U.S. study showed slightly higher rates of tics in children who got more thimerosal at earlier ages, but no autism." and "about 1,000 children exposed to different levels of thimerosal in the United States also showed more tics in the children heavily exposed to thimerosal". I was never one to argue that vaccines cause a particular disease, I really don't care what disease(s) they cause, but they obviously are not safe, which is my only point. Tics but no autism, is that what you call safe? If you don't know what tics are I suggest you hit one of these links and find out. 

* When newborns and some toddlers are injured by vaccines resulting in death, medical investigators are reluctant to ever link the vaccinations to the cause of death, no matter how many similar deaths their are in close proximity (within days or a weeks) vaccinations. The catch all term SIDS is used to deem and infant death as a mystery, or worse blamed on sleep position. In the wake of the new Gardasil vaccine previously healthy teens and pre-teens are falling ill and dying of toxic symptoms. The link between these deaths and the vaccines are also trying to be erased and distanced as fall as possible. This is completely illogical and unscientific. If healthy babies and teens are suddenly falling ill and/or dying all after receiving a dose of toxic in the form of a vaccine yet the medical industry never draws a link between the two, something is going on, wouldn't you think? 

Let's Think: What kind of world do we live in when mercury and formaldehyde are safe but natural sleep positions are deadly? Contrary to what a SIDS pamphlet might suggest newborns are programed with certain survival reflexes that protect them from what I call "silly deaths". Any normal human of any age will wake up from sleep if the flow of oxygen is obstructed. Newborn babies are capable of stopping their breathing when submerged underwater (this is why parents that understand this are able to teach their babies to swim at very early ages). Babies are not dumb and they do not die from sleeping. But they will be harmed from doses of mercury and formaldehyde in their bloodstream. Further, in no other instance then when vaccines are involved does determining the actual cause of death of an individual suddenly become so illusive. It is not difficult for a trained M.D. to perform and autopsy and blood work and differentiate between an accidental crib strangulation or smothering by stuffed animals, or toxicity in the bloodstream. They aren't doing these types of investigations and releasing the results on purpose. 

* Vaccines also contain bio contaminants from animal ingredients. This includes other viruses that aren't actually supposed to be in the vaccines as well as the DNA of animals and human cells used in the concoction. The danger in this is genetic toxicity and/or DNA transcession, the process of which foreign DNA fragments become absorbed and combined with the host's DNA structure causing all kinda of biomess like cancer for one. The body may also fail to recognize its own cells that have been transcessed, causing the immune system to attack itself. Many of the vaccines have not been tested for their levels of genetic toxicity and thus they ignore the potential danger. 

Let's Think: Basically that means that vaccination has been introducing foreign DNA into the human genome for decades and we wonder what's up with all the cancer, leukemia and other genetic and immune disorders. One thing is for certain, if you are fearful of cancer, cervical or otherwise, injecting foreign DNA into your blood stream to meld with your cells is not the answer. Do we need a specific test of vaccines or can we be pretty safe in saying that if foreign DNA can merge itself with human DNA when it enters the bloodstream bypassing the natural immune barriers that vaccines would be no exception? Merck has not tested Gardasil for its genetic toxicity although they advertise it as a preventative measure against cancer. Let me repeat, they have not tested whether or not Gardasil will cause cancer! I have also read that Merck has a history of altering their safety tests in order to mask the dangers of their products. Vioxx killed, and now we have people lining up their children for the same company's lasted product and even considering legally mandating this mass experiment on our children. The insanity of it all is astounding.